With the majority of live casino developers preferring to stick to their own tried-and-tested formulas, Avanti Studios co-founder Jonas Delin considers whether the vertical’s continued commercial success has stifled innovation – and what needs to change to maintain momentum.
Over the past decade or so, few iGaming verticals have experienced a growth story to rival live casino, but as this competitive and ever-evolving industry enters a new phase of technological development, you have to ask yourself – has this growth perhaps come at the cost of innovation?
While it’s true that live casino has thrived in recent years – particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the vertical provided a vital bridge for players looking to enjoy an authentic casino experience from the comfort of their own homes – it’s fair to say that, despite its ongoing commercial success, the core product format remains largely unchanged as we move into 2026.
In my opinion, the old adage “if it’s not broke, don’t fix it” will only take you so far. There will come a time when re-skinning the same games with the same maths models starts to generate incrementally less excitement among casino players, and it’s at this point that stagnation will set in. With this in mind, innovation will be vital to ensuring live casino stays on its current trajectory.
Re-skins replacing revolution
Now, this isn’t to say that live casino hasn’t innovated in the past, but rather that this innovation has stalled as the vertical has become more widely available. What began as basic blackjack and roulette in the early 2010s did evolve via the introduction of HD streaming and mobile optimisation, with side bets, multipliers and “lightning” formats also adding variety to the genre.
Perhaps the last truly transformational leap for the vertical was the introduction of the game show format, with titles such as Monopoly Live and Crazy Time genuinely bringing something players hadn’t seen before. Since then, however, creativity has fallen flat, with most “new” releases simply being variations on tried-and-tested themes rather than anything actually groundbreaking.
Indeed, you only have to look around at the number of versions of Lightning Roulette, or blackjack games with slightly different side bets, that exist to see the problem. Put simply, innovation has become cosmetic rather than mechanical, and the live casino providers that currently dominate the sector mostly look to expand via themed extensions rather than wholesale structural change.
Is dominance killing innovation?
So why is this the case? If live casino has innovated in the past, surely it can do so again now the need has arisen? Well, the answer basically boils down to a mixture of risk aversion, economics and market maturity. With all three factors being closely linked, operators are opting to play it safe with titles they know instead of taking a punt on new formats that may or may not be successful.
As with many other industries, it mainly comes back to money. Take film as an example. Given the astronomical costs of shooting a movie, is it any wonder that cinemas are now littered with reboots, sequels and “extended universe” instalments from popular franchises such as Star Wars, Marvel and DC? Producers know their audiences and they know what sells, so they attempt to minimise their risk by replicating past success at the expense of creating new, original cinema.
Live casino is no different. In terms of costs, it’s far and away the most expensive of all the iGaming verticals, with studio builds, equipment rental and staff overheads all adding to the bill. Couple that with the fact that the same games continue to provide consistent margins in regulated markets worldwide, and operators are less inclined to expose themselves by experimenting when they can simply copy and paste the same winning formula; the juice just isn’t worth the squeeze.chitecture allows operators to adjust their content offering.”
Experimentation breeds success
Compare this to other verticals like slots and crash games – where gamification features, hybrid mechanics and additional social layers are all becoming increasingly mandatory ingredients for success – and the contrast couldn’t be starker. As these iGaming sectors don’t need to contend with the same costs as live casino, developers have the flexibility and freedom to be more creative in their approach to game design, and the level of innovation has clearly accelerated as a result.
Here, when a provider fails, they fail fast. If a new game is launched and doesn’t perform to expectations, the team behind it simply takes whatever learnings they can from it and moves on to the next release with little delay and minimal losses. If a similar structure could be put in place for live casino, we’d inevitably see developers experimenting more and being less risk-averse, but to get to that point, we’ll need to totally overhaul how the vertical is managed on a technical level.
Thankfully, there are currently a number of companies – Avanti Studios included – that have shown a willingness to take on this challenge and find a more efficient way of doing things. At the heart of the matter is the financial and developmental millstone of having to rely on physical studio builds and real-life dealers. If these aspects can be managed more effectively, operators will be able to unshackle themselves from budgetary restrictions and the stage for greater innovation will be set.
Preparing for a digital tomorrow
It’s for this reason that the future of live casino will almost certainly see a shift away from using established analogue processes in favour of inventive digital alternatives. With today’s CGI and MetaHuman technologies providing developers with a quick and cost-effective way to generate immersive casino environments and use lifelike digital clones in place of dealers, it’s possible to create games that look real, feel real and play real without the need for expensive studio set-ups.
Of course, moving over to such a model will mean that development and roll-out of new titles will also happen much more quickly. As live casino providers won’t need to physically build a casino environment, or hire and train dealers whenever they want to launch a new title, experimentation will be encouraged and attempting to do something different won’t come with the same risks in terms of investing time and resources, allowing them to innovate at a pace to rival slot providers.
In terms of scalability and personalisation, the knock-on effects of this will be huge. As there are no considerations to be made around staff overheads and studio space, operators will have the freedom to launch as many tables, in as many limits, as they require, making it simple to adapt their offering to keep up with demand. Dealer language and appearance, as well as tailored branding, can also be added at will, making it easier to customise games to their individual needs.
Lightning won’t strike twice
Naturally, greater live casino innovation will also invite increased regulatory scrutiny as lawmakers attempt to get their teeth into the fairness of any new game formats. For this reason, I expect the hybridisation of live casino and RNG mechanics to also become increasingly prevalent across the sector in the months to come. This will allow developers to provide consistent and error-free gameplay that’s also provably fair and fully compliant with all relevant local restrictions.
With this just being a snapshot of some of the untapped potential that still remains within the live casino industry, the question isn’t so much one of whether further innovation is likely to happen, but rather which providers will be willing to step away from the established blueprint first. For us – and other companies doing their bit to pioneer new digital technologies in the sector – it’s clear the next big movement is already underway; and it’s not the launch of another “lightning” game!
